Éditoriaux Défense Sécurité Terrorisme Zones de conflits Logistique Livres de référence Liens
Terre Air Mer Gendarmerie Renseignement Infoguerre Cyber Recherche

Powell Says Campaign Against Terrorism Has Begun

Powell Says Campaign Against Terrorism Has Begun

The United States has already begun a broad campaign against the perpetrators of the September 11 terrorist attacks at the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, and against terrorism in general, says Secretary of State Colin Powell. Appearing on the NBC News program "Meet the Press" September 23, Powell said "It's begun with rallying the international communities on our side of this issue, letting nations around the world know that this is the time to choose, you're either for freedom or you're for terrorism." Source: Washington File (EUR108), U.S. Department of State, Washington D.C., September 24, 2001.

The secretary also said he is "absolutely convinced" that the al-Qaeda network headed by Usama bin Laden was responsible for the attacks.

Following is the State Department transcript of the interview: (begin transcript)

U.S. Department of State, Office of the Spokesman, September 23, 2001.

Interview of Secretary of State Colin L. Powell on NBC's Meet the Press, September 23, 2001.

Question: But first, the Secretary of State is with us. General Colin Powell, welcome.

Secretary Powell: Good morning, Tim.

Question: Twelve days ago, America was attacked like never before. Where are we in terms of response?

Powell: In terms of response, we have begun a broad campaign against the perpetrators of this attack, and also against terrorism in general. The campaign has already begun. It has begun with rallying the international communities on our side of this issue, letting nations around the world know that this is a time to choose. You're either for freedom or you're for terrorism.

And we have also continued the campaign by getting nations such as the United Arab Emirates to cut off relations with the Taliban. We are getting cooperation with respect to shutting down the financial systems that exist to provide support to these kinds of organizations. We are getting solid action in the United Nations and Nation and the Organization of American States, the Organization of Islamic Conferences. Many things are happening. So this campaign has begun.

We got solid support from Pakistan, as you well know. And, of course, we are putting in place our forces, in the event the President decides it's time to use military force as part of the campaign. But we are not waiting. The campaign has begun.

Question: And we have lifted economic sanctions against Pakistan, as a reward for their assistance?

Powell: We have waived some sanctions that have been in place against both Pakistan and India. It was something we had been considering for some months now. But we consulted with Congress this past week in light of these changed events, and in light of the very forthcoming position that the Pakistani Government has taken, and the President waived some of the sanctions that were in place yesterday.

Question: But it is an important signal that the United States will reward its friends.

Powell: It's an important signal that we will stand by our friends who stand by us.

Question: Are you absolutely convinced that Usama bin Laden was responsible for this attack?

Powell: I am absolutely convinced that the al-Qaida network, which he heads, was responsible for this attack. You know, it's sort of al-Qaida -- the Arab name for it is "the base" -- it's something like a holding company of terrorist organizations that are located in dozens of countries around the world, sometimes tightly controlled, sometimes loosely controlled. And at the head of that organization is Usama bin Laden. So what we have to do in the first phase of this campaign is to go after al-Qaida and go after Usama bin Laden. But it is not just a problem in Afghanistan; it's a problem throughout the world. That's why we are attacking it with a worldwide coalition.

Question: Will you release publicly a white paper, which links him and his organization to this attack, to put people at ease?

Powell: We are hard at work bringing all the information together, intelligence information, law enforcement information. And I think, in the near future, we will be able to put out a paper, a document, that will describe quite clearly the evidence that we have linking him to this attack. And also, remember, he has been linked to earlier attacks against US interests and he was already indicated for earlier attacks against the United States.

Question: Do you believe there is any United States law or executive order, which would prohibit our killing Usama bin Laden, if we find him?

Powell: An interesting question. There are a number of authorities that are in place, executive orders and the like, that we are examining, to make sure that we have all the freedom of action we need to bring him to justice or to bring justice to him, as the President has said.

Question: Let me show you an article in USA Today, dateline Islamabad, and I'll put it on the screen:

To some Pakistanis, bin Laden is like a god. T-shirts and turbans bearing the image of Usama bin Laden and the words "world hero" are big sellers at the open market. So are fake credit cards, $50 bills with his picture and phrase "In Usama we trust." But forget about buying cassettes and CDs of his fiery teachings where he says "Every American man is my enemy." They sold out hours after last Tuesday's attack at six times the normal price. Usama has become like a god for the Moslem people, says Amir Kahn, 21, as he waived a white Taliban flag and led anti-American protests outside the city's Red Mosque. "America and Pakistan should be warned if they try to kill Usama or attack our Afghan brothers, we'll wage war against them. American and Pakistani blood will flow in the streets."

Is there a concern by demonizing Usama bin Laden that we could trigger an uprising in Pakistan that may have very serious destabilization for that country, which has nuclear weapons?

Powell: We are very sensitive to this question. And it is unfortunate that there are Moslems who feel that way. The reality is that Usama bin Laden has demonized himself. He is unfaithful to the religion that he says he is an adherent to. He is a murderer. He has murdered thousands of people, not just Americans, thousands of people from around the world. Eighty countries lost people in the World Trade Center. He has committed these acts of murder around the world, and that's what he should be seen as, a murderer.

And, in fact, there are many Moslems and many Islamic countries, led countries, that are supporting of our efforts. And I hope that as we go forward, as we put the evidence out, the case will clearly be made that he is not someone to be admired or followed; he is someone to be condemned as against civilization as we know it, against the principles that we believe in, against the principles that will make this a better world, not a world of terror and violence.

Question: Are you confident that the current Pakistan Government can remain stable and that the nuclear weapons that they have will not fall in the hands of supporters of Usama bin Laden?

Powell: Everything I've seen over the last two weeks convinces me that President Musharraf made a courageous decision and he did it with full awareness of the potential domestic consequences. He is supported by all of his military commanders and all others in the government. So, I am confident that Pakistan will remain stable and I have no concerns about their nuclear programs.

Question: There is a $25 million reward for Usama bin Laden. Do you think there is a possibility that someone on the ground in Afghanistan could drop a dime on him for the money?

Secretary Powell: $25 million is a great deal of money, and I am sure there might be somebody so motivated, whether they can do that or not. But let's not just focus on Usama bin Laden. It would be nice to see him brought to justice. But that won't end it. It's the whole network that has to be ripped up and brought to justice.

That's why it isn't strictly a military operation; it is an operation that covers financial activity, information activity, protection of borders, shutting down the ability of people to move easily from country to country. That's why we are calling it a full-scale campaign, using all the elements of national and international power.

Question: Afghanistan. How would you rate the Taliban army?

Powell: Well, the Taliban regime has a military force that has succeeded in gaining control of some 90 percent of the country. But it is not a modern force by any means. It is a very dispersed force, at the lower end of the ability to conduct modern warfare. But it is a force that one would have to take seriously because of their experience in the kind of warfare that is typical of Afghanistan.

And as we develop our plans, they will be plans that go after al-Qaida and we will try to take advantage of whatever weaknesses exist there and play to our strengths and not act against their strengths.

Question: The Russians when -- then the Soviet Union -- engaged in a 10-year war with Afghanistan, lost about 30,000 people according to unofficial estimates. One gentleman who was in the service there, now in the Russian Parliament, Yevgeny Zelinov, said that no matter how they prepare for a ground operation, it is hopeless in that environment.

Powell: It depends what kind of a mission you are trying to achieve and what your objectives are before you declare hopelessness. And I am sure our military leaders have a pretty good idea of the difficulties of operating in Afghanistan. And I am sure all of our military leaders have studied carefully previous experience, especially the experience of the Russian army.

Question: It's a different kind of war -- if we have one. General Powell, as you well know, the Powell Doctrine, using overwhelming force in order to overcome our enemy. General Wesley Clark, who oversaw our operations in Kosovo, said we become allergic to close combat. How different is a war against terrorists in Afghanistan than from something you mounted in the Persian Gulf 10 years ago?

Powell: It's quite different. And I never talked about overwhelming force, I've always talked about decisive force. Meaning, you go to the point of decision and that's where you apply decisive force.

In the Persian Gulf war 10 years ago, you had an army sitting out there, easily identifiable. There it was, waiting to be attacked, and we applied decisive force against the Iraqi army. It's different this time. And we shouldn't see this in the same context, as if there is a large enemy out there that we plan to attack in conventional ways.

If the President decides that this is what we should do and have to do, I can assure you that our military will have plans that will go against their weaknesses and not get trapped in ways that previous armies have gotten trapped in Afghanistan.

Question: Previous wars from the air, very limited if any American casualties. Do you think the American people would be accepting of large amounts of casualties in order to win this war?

Powell: You know, I have always shied away from this concept that you can fight a war without casualties. It has never been anything that I put forward. You always want to make sure you can minimize casualties and do everything you can to protect the force. But war is war and there will be casualties.

I think the American people understand that this is a difficult situation and we may have to put lives at risk. And it is something that the military understands. And we can't conduct wars in such a way that we are terrified of putting anyone at risk. War does put people at risk and it's a risk we have to take in light of the current circumstances. We will always try to conduct all of our military operations in a way that reduces casualties as much as possible, but there is no such thing as a zero-casualty conflict where you are using all the elements of your military power and you are going into a place, say, like Afghanistan.

Question: Sixty-five percent of the people in the Arab world are under the age of 18. How concerned are you that countries like Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia could become destabilized, that revolution could be fomented if, in fact, there is a large-scale war?

Powell: Well, let's not assume there will be a large-scale war. I don't know that we should even consider a large-scale war of the conventional type. But it is more interesting to note that Egypt and Saudi Arabia and most of the countries in that part of the world have come to our support. They have recognized that terrorism is a threat not only against the United States, against them. They have suffered from terrorism as well. And they recognize that this is not consistent with Islamic teachings. It is absolutely inconsistent with Islamic teachings.

So I think they understand the domestic pressures they are under and they understand what they have committed themselves to. And when you even have countries such as Syria and to some extent even Iran indicating that they sense the problem associated with this kind of attack, it gives us something to explore, something to work with. And what we should be looking at really is the solid support we have received from Arab nations.

Question: Let me show you what the President of Egypt, Hosni Mubarak had to say and give you a chance to talk about it a little bit. "If you launch an attack against Afghanistan or another country on your list of rogue states, you will kill many innocent people, just as the terrorists killed many of your people," President Mubarak said in an interview. "Don't play the game of your enemy. They want your reprisals to bring forth from the blood and ruins of your bombing a new generation of militants who will cry for revenge against the United States."

Powell: We are very sensitive to that. One has to be careful that in your reaction, you don't give the enemy exactly what the enemy would like to have, a new cause celebre. And so we will be very sensitive to that. And I know that my colleagues in the Pentagon are sensitive to that, as they consider the various options that are available to them.

Question: The Washington Post reported yesterday that Saudi Arabia is denying the United States the use of Prince Sultan Airbase as a place for offensive operations. Is that true?

Powell: Well, the article said that I had called them to protest this or ask for a change in policy. There were no such phone calls. The article is incorrect. And I have been in daily touch with Saudi officials and they have been very responsive to all of the requests we have placed on them.

Question: So they will allow us to use that airbase?

Powell: They have been very responsive to all the requests we have placed on them. There is no show-stopper with respect to what we have asked of the Saudis. But I do not want to go into what we have not yet asked of them.

But, as of right now, for everything we have put to them, they have been responsive in a way that we can see that responsiveness, if it is not always headline news or something that you would see across, say, a television screen. But they have been responsive.

Question: Many of the hijackers had ties to Saudi Arabia. Tom Friedman, who has lived and studied and written about this world for a long time had this to say in the New York Times. "Some Arab regimes, most of which are corrupt dictatorships afraid of their own people, made a devil's pact with the fundamentalists. They allowed the Islamic extremist domestic supporters to continue raising money, ostensibly for Moslem welfare groups, and to funnel it to Usama bin Laden on the condition that the Islamic extremists not attack these regimes. The Saudis in particular struck that bargain."

Powell: Well, I have found that in recent days the Saudis have been very forthcoming with respect to that kind of issue, and they have promised us full cooperation in going after financial support for these kinds of groups. As you know, a long time ago, they ostracized Usama bin Laden and took away his Saudi citizenship. We are working closely with them.

But I also need to point out that a lot of the financial support comes from outside the Arab world. I mean, it is quite easy in European nations and in the United States to raise money for these kinds of dissident, terrorist-oriented causes. And so it is not just an Arab problem, it is an international problem. We have to go after their financial support wherever we find it, in Arab nations or in western nations.

We are also focusing on some of the so-called humanitarian, charitable, non-governmental organizations that raise money. If we can trace any of that money to terrorist activity subsequently, we really have to go after these kinds of organizations as well.

Question: On Friday, several Americans, several dozen Americans, the Project of the New American Century, released a letter to the President saying that we should target terrorism wherever it exists, even if it means conducting military operations against Iraq, Syria, Iran. In your estimation, what would happen to your international coalition if we were to mount military campaigns against Iraq, Syria and Iran while still trying to find Usama bin Laden in Afghanistan?

Powell: Rather than deal with that hypothetical, let me deal with what we are actually going to do. What the President said is we're going to go after terrorism. That doesn't always mean you have to use military force to go after terrorism. There are many elements of national power. And you also have to keep your attention focused on a particular objective, before you start adding different goals and objectives.

And the objective that the President has focused on in this first instance is al-Qaida, Usama bin Laden, his presence in Afghanistan. And then we will consider all other options and all other sources of terrorist activity and go after it in an appropriate way. That approach has met with great favor in the international community.

And since this has to be an international response to an international threat, I think it is important that we are able to get the United Nations Security Council resolutions that will help us deal with the financial transactions that take place. That's why I think it is important that we keep that coalition together so we get a statement such as we did Friday night from the European Council giving full support of the European Union to what we are doing. It is important we keep that coalition together so you can get statements such as we did Friday from the Organization of American States or the Organization of Islamic Conferences.

If we want to go it alone and say we know what's best in all of these cases and we know exactly how to deal with them and lose the support of the world, then I think we will have made a strategic mistake. New opportunities have been presented by the way the President has laid out this campaign and the focus that he has given to it. And he has made the decision about how we are going to go about this campaign. And he has left nothing off the table with respect to phase two, phase three or phase four. And we will get to those phases in due course. But let's not lose our focus on phase one.

Question: Are there some in the administration who are urging more immediate attacks on Syria and Iran, rooting out terrorists?

Powell: As you would in any administration, we had lots of discussions. But the President, his Vice President, the Secretary of State, the Secretary of Defense, the National Security Advisor, the Attorney General, the Secretary of the Treasury, all were together and discussed these items and the President made his decision and that's the only thing that counts, not what others somewhere in the administration might think.

Question: Iran and Syria have long harbored terrorists. Is this a chance for them to have a new start, a fresh start with America by saying, you know what, we're going to take care of our terrorist problem and we're going to help you deal with Usama bin Laden?

Powell: I think that might well be the case. They have been sponsors of terrorism and we have so designated them and those designations have not gone away. But the Syrians were somewhat forthcoming in their response to 11 September and I talked to the Syrian Foreign Minister and we are looking to see if we can explore areas of cooperation.

But they can't be for one kind of terrorism and against another kind of terrorism. They have to realize, you've got to change your pattern if you want to be a part of this civilized world that is in a coalition against terrorism.

And the same message goes to Iran. Not quite the same context, but we have heard from the Iranians through channels, and we are willing to explore this possibility. They have always been against the Taliban and against this kind of activity in Afghanistan, but they have also supported terrorist organizations. You have got to be ready to go against all terrorist organizations.

Question: But it's pretty hard with Iran, because of their involvement in Khobar Towers, where they blew up a lot of our service men.

Powell: Yes, it is. And what the President said in his speech is continued conduct of that kind will identify you as someone who has a hostile interest toward the United States and the interests of the civilized world.

Question: How about Saddam Hussein and Iraq? Is there any evidence that he was involved in the attack on the World Trade Center or the Pentagon? And is he currently harboring terrorists and therefore is someone that we would like to engage on this issue?

Secretary Powell: Well, there are some reports of linkages but not to the extent that I would say today there is a clear link. But we are looking for links and we are watching very closely. We have no illusions about Saddam Hussein. He means us no good, he means the region no good. He has, of course, tried to develop weapons of mass destruction. For 10 years, we have kept him contained and we will continue to keep him contained. And, as you know, we always have the ability to strike if that seems to be the appropriate thing to do.

And so we are taking no options off the table. And we always consider him to be a potential source of terrorist activity and to harbor terrorism and terrorist activities. So we have got a good eye on the Iraqi regime.

Question: There are reports this morning on the news wires the Taliban Government is saying Usama bin Laden is missing. How confident are you that we will find Usama bin Laden?

Powell: I don't know. I really can't answer that question. He might be "missing," whatever that means. I am not quite sure I am ready to put credence into the Taliban report. The Taliban may be trying to find a way to get themselves out of the terrible box they are in. I don't know.

And even if we were to get Usama bin Laden tomorrow, he showed up, was turned over to us, that would be good but it would not be the end. It's his lieutenants we have to get, it's the whole network that has to be ripped up. We can't rip out the head and have the tail and other parts of it laying around waiting.

Question: How many people are we talking about?

Powell: We're talking several thousand, maybe many thousands. We're not entirely sure. But we do know --

Question: Everywhere? Europe, America?

Powell: They're everywhere. They're in Europe, they're in America. You can find connections to them all around. And we have to get them all, or else we will always have a degree of uncertainty and a degree of insecurity within not only American society but within societies all over the world.

We have to keep remembering that the World Trade Center was that, the World Trade Center. Almost 80 countries, about 80 countries, lost citizens. And so it was an attack against Americans, it was an attack against Moslems, it was an attack against Jews, it was an attack against Africa and Asia and Europe, all parts of the world. It was the World Trade Center and they knew what they were doing.

Question: You have lived a full life, mostly as a military man. You've seen death up close. How have the events of September 11th changed you?

Powell: They have been deeply moving for me as they have for every American. To see your own home state, New York -- I'm a New Yorker -- to see it struck that way and then to see a building that I spent so many years in the Pentagon struck that way -- I went over to the Pentagon yesterday with Don Rumsfeld, Secretary Rumsfeld, to look around.

It's deeply moving to know that, one, we had this kind of vulnerability and that there were people out there who we knew were out there but never really had a sense of how determined they were to strike us in this way. And it means that as we go forward, we will have to work harder to protect ourselves, work harder to find this kind of enemy, work harder to defend ourselves. And I am so pleased that Governor Ridge will be playing an important role in homeland security.

But at the same time, I'm just as convinced, in the face of this horror, that we've got to go on, we will go on. We're a strong people, we have a backbone of steel, we're patriotic, we're not afraid of people. We're not going to hide under our desks, we're not going to go into bunkers.

We've got to get back to work, we've got to get back to our ballgames, we've got to get back to our theaters. We've got to get this economy moving again. And that will be the best answer to what happened. While we're also chasing them, while we're also going after our campaign with all the vigor at our disposal and all the strength at our disposal. The real answer to them is to get back at being Americans, the kind of Americans we know we are. And we'll show the world what this country is really made of.

Question: Before you go, why do they hate us so much and how do we offer those young Moslem boys and girls around the world a competing destiny that says America is not bad, our capitalist system is not bad, Christianity and Judaism is not bad. Because the leaders of Usama bin Laden's group are fueling within them this rabid hate for our country and our way of life.

Powell: Well, for reasons that are very complex, they hate our value system, they hate our presence in parts of the world that they think we should not be in.

But let me make this point. Go to any American city and you will find many proud American Moslems, proud American Moslems who came to this country because they wanted to be a part of this society, who came to this country for the opportunities we presented, who came to this country proud of their Moslem heritage but at the same time wanting to be an American, just as my parents came to this country and your grandparents came to this country.

And so while we are looking at the Moslems who through a false application of their faith are doing this, let's look at those Moslems who understand the power of the democratic system, who understand the power of the free enterprise system and let's celebrate the Moslems who have come to this country to become Americans and to share in the values of this nation.

Question: Colin Powell, Secretary of State, we thank you for joining us this morning.

(end transcript)

 

Derniers articles

Verdun 2016 : La légende de la « tranchée des baïonnettes »
Eyes in the Dark: Navy Dive Helmet Display Emerges as Game-Changer
OIR Official: Captured Info Describes ISIL Operations in Manbij
Cyber, Space, Middle East Join Nuclear Triad Topics at Deterrence Meeting
Carter Opens Second DoD Innovation Hub in Boston
Triomphe de St-Cyr : le Vietnam sur les rangs
Dwight D. Eisenhower Conducts First OIR Missions from Arabian Gulf
L’amiral Prazuck prend la manœuvre de la Marine
Airmen Practice Rescuing Downed Pilots in Pacific Thunder 16-2
On ne lutte pas contre les moustiques avec une Kalachnikov...
Enemy Mine: Underwater Drones Hunt Buried Targets, Save Lives
Daesh Publications Are Translated Into Eleven Languages
Opération Chammal : 10 000 heures de vol en opération pour les Mirage 2000 basés en Jordanie
Le Drian : Daech : une réponse à plusieurs niveaux
Carter: Defense Ministers Agree on Next Steps in Counter-ISIL Fight
Carter Convenes Counter-ISIL Coalition Meeting at Andrews
Carter Welcomes France’s Increased Counter-ISIL Support
100-Plus Aircraft Fly in for Exercise Red Flag 16-3
Growlers Soar With B-1s Around Ellsworth AFB
A-10s Deploy to Slovakia for Cross-Border Training
We Don’t Fight Against Mosquitoes With a Kalashnikov
Bug-Hunting Computers to Compete in DARPA Cyber Grand Challenge
Chiefs of US and Chinese Navies Agree on Need for Cooperation
DoD Cyber Strategy Defines How Officials Discern Cyber Incidents from Armed Attacks
Vice Adm. Tighe Takes Charge of Information Warfare, Naval Intelligence
Truman Strike Group Completes Eight-Month Deployment
KC-46 Completes Milestone by Refueling Fighter Jet, Cargo Plane
Air Dominance and the Critical Role of Fifth Generation Fighters
Une nation est une âme
The Challenges of Ungoverned Spaces
Carter Salutes Iraqi Forces, Announces 560 U.S. Troops to Deploy to Iraq
Obama: U.S. Commitment to European Security is Unwavering in Pivotal Time for NATO
International Court to Decide Sovereignty Issue in South China Sea
La SPA 75 est centenaire !
U.S. to Deploy THAAD Missile Battery to South Korea
Maintien en condition des matériels : reprendre l’initiative
La veste « léopard », premier uniforme militaire de camouflage
Océan Indien 2016 : Opérations & Coopération
Truman Transits Strait of Gibraltar
Navy Unveils National Museum of the American Sailor
New Navy, Old Tar
Marcel Dassault parrain de la nouvelle promotion d’officiers de l’École de l’Air
RIMPAC 2016 : Ravitaillement à la mer pour le Prairial avant l’arrivée à Hawaii
Bataille de la Somme, l’oubliée
U.S., Iceland Sign Security Cooperation Agreement
Cléopatra : la frégate Jean Bart entre dans l’histoire du BPC Gamal Abdel Nasser
Surveiller l’espace maritime français aussi par satellite
America's Navy-Marine Corps Team Fuse for RIMPAC 2016
Stratégie France : Plaidoyer pour une véritable coopération franco-allemande
La lumière du Droit rayonne au bout du chemin





Directeur de la publication : Joël-François Dumont
Comité de rédaction : Jacques de Lestapis, Hugues Dumont, François de Vries (Bruxelles), Hans-Ulrich Helfer (Suisse), Michael Hellerforth (Allemagne).
Comité militaire : VAE Guy Labouérie (†), GAA François Mermet (2S), CF Patrice Théry (Asie).

Contact