Éditoriaux Défense Sécurité Terrorisme Zones de conflits Logistique Livres de référence Liens
Terre Air Mer Gendarmerie Renseignement Infoguerre Cyber Recherche

Flexibility, Adaptability at Heart of Military Transformation

Flexibility, Adaptability at Heart of Military Transformation

By Jim Garamone, American Forces Press Service.

Fort Lesley J. McNair, D.C. -- (AFPS) January 31, 2002 -- A culture of change, flexibility and adaptability is more important to transforming the military than simply having new hardware, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld told students Jan. 31 at the National Defense University here.

To illustrate his point, Rumsfeld told the students about the battle for Mazar-e Sharif in November. He said U.S. Army and Air Force special operations forces teamed with the Northern Alliance.

The Americans rode into battle on horseback alongside their Afghan allies. They found targets and radioed their positions to waiting U.S. Navy and Air Force pilots who used precision-guided munitions to bomb Taliban and Al Qaeda positions.

"The explosions were deafening and the timing so precise that, as the soldiers described it, hundreds of Afghan horsemen emerged, literally, out of the smoke, riding down on the enemy through clouds of dust and flying shrapnel," Rumsfeld said.

He said what won the battle for Mazar-e Sharif was a combination "of the ingenuity of the U.S. Special Forces, the most advanced, precision-guided munitions in the U.S. arsenal delivered by U.S. Navy, Air Force and Marine Corps crews, and the courage of valiant one-legged Afghan fighters on horseback."

He said the scene in Northern Afghanistan was where the 19th century met the 21st century. The mixture of horse cavalry and high-tech weaponry is precisely what the idea of transformation of the military is all about, Rumsfeld said.

"It shows that a revolution in military affairs is about more than building new high-tech weapons, though that is certainly a part of it," he said. "It is also about new ways of thinking … and new ways of fighting."

He cited the German innovations that led to the Blitzkrieg as an example of transformation. The German army that overwhelmed France and drove Britain to the sea in 1940 took existing weapons and used them in new and transformational ways. The same could be said for the battle of Mazar-e Sharif.

"Coalition forces took existing military capabilities -- from the most advanced (laser-guided weapons) to the antique (40-year-old B-52s updated with modern electronics) to the most rudimentary (an armed man on horseback) -- and used them together in unprecedented ways, with devastating effect on enemy positions, enemy morale and … the cause of evil in the world," he said.

Rumsfeld was quick to caution the audience of senior military officers and senior government civilians not to lock themselves into the battles in Afghanistan as a model. The model is the thinking that went on in the country as U.S. forces adapted quickly to new challenges and unexpected circumstances.

Rumsfeld said the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11 would more than likely be the way that foes will challenge the United States in the future. He said enemy nations cannot hope to compete with the United States on a conventional basis. They will attack using asymmetrical weapons and tactics.

He explained to the students why a new national defense strategy and a new force-sizing construct are necessary. The 1990s strategy based on fighting and winning two nearly simultaneous major regional wars "served us well in the post-Cold War period, but it threatened to leave us reasonably prepared for two specific conflicts and under- prepared for unexpected contingencies and 21st century challenges," he said.

The new defense strategy is capabilities-based, not threat- based as in the past. He said the new approach focuses less on who and where the threats are and concentrates more on what the threats might be -- and how to deter and defend against them.

Rumsfeld said an adversary, for instance, might target U.S. information infrastructure and space assets and try to limit U.S. use of foreign bases.

"They know that we have no defense against ballistic missile attacks on our cities, our people, our forces or our friends," he said. That vulnerability could tempt those who wish America ill to develop such capabilities.

He listed six transformational goals of U.S. defense strategy:

  • Protect the U.S. homeland and our bases overseas.
  • Project and sustain U.S. military power.
  • Deny enemies sanctuary.
  • Protect information networks from attack.
  • Use American information superiority to seamlessly weld the U.S. armed forces together as a joint force.
  • Maintain unhindered access to space and to protect U.S. space assets.

"Our challenge in the 21st century is to defend our cities and our infrastructure from new forms of attack while projecting our forces over long distances to fight new adversaries," he said.

The new thrust means a change in deterrence. Rumsfeld said the U.S. nuclear arsenal did not deter the terrorists who attacked the United States in September. President Bush has committed he United States to cutting the number of nuclear warheads from 6,000 to between 1,700 and 2,200. The Russians have announced a similar drop.

Deterrence now may mean other things. "Deployment of effective missile defenses may dissuade others from spending to obtain ballistic missiles," he said. Similar efforts to "harden" U.S. satellite systems may dissuade countries from investing in "killer satellites."

Transformation also requires rebalancing U.S. forces. He said DoD must look at "low density-high demand" capabilities. He said this term is a Pentagon euphemism for "our priorities were wrong and we didn't buy enough."

"The Department of Defense has known for some time that it does not have enough manned reconnaissance and surveillance aircraft, command and control aircraft, air defense capabilities, chemical and biological defense units, as well as certain types of special operations forces," Rumsfeld said. "In spite of the shortage of these and other systems, the Defense Department postponed the needed investments while continuing to fund what were, in retrospect, less valuable programs. This must change."

The pressure on DoD is to handle near-term military threats and push off transformation. "But Sept. 11 taught us that the future holds many unknown dangers and that we fail to prepare for them at our peril," he said. He said DoD cannot afford to move back into the mindset of business as usual. "The war on terrorism is a new war and 'cries out' for new thinking."

He said the men and women of DoD are up to the task. He said DoD can fight the current war on terrorism and plan the military of the future. "The impetus and urgency added by the events of Sept. 11 powerfully make the case for action," he said.

Related Site of Interest:

 

Derniers articles

Verdun 2016 : La légende de la « tranchée des baïonnettes »
Eyes in the Dark: Navy Dive Helmet Display Emerges as Game-Changer
OIR Official: Captured Info Describes ISIL Operations in Manbij
Cyber, Space, Middle East Join Nuclear Triad Topics at Deterrence Meeting
Carter Opens Second DoD Innovation Hub in Boston
Triomphe de St-Cyr : le Vietnam sur les rangs
Dwight D. Eisenhower Conducts First OIR Missions from Arabian Gulf
L’amiral Prazuck prend la manœuvre de la Marine
Airmen Practice Rescuing Downed Pilots in Pacific Thunder 16-2
On ne lutte pas contre les moustiques avec une Kalachnikov...
Enemy Mine: Underwater Drones Hunt Buried Targets, Save Lives
Daesh Publications Are Translated Into Eleven Languages
Opération Chammal : 10 000 heures de vol en opération pour les Mirage 2000 basés en Jordanie
Le Drian : Daech : une réponse à plusieurs niveaux
Carter: Defense Ministers Agree on Next Steps in Counter-ISIL Fight
Carter Convenes Counter-ISIL Coalition Meeting at Andrews
Carter Welcomes France’s Increased Counter-ISIL Support
100-Plus Aircraft Fly in for Exercise Red Flag 16-3
Growlers Soar With B-1s Around Ellsworth AFB
A-10s Deploy to Slovakia for Cross-Border Training
We Don’t Fight Against Mosquitoes With a Kalashnikov
Bug-Hunting Computers to Compete in DARPA Cyber Grand Challenge
Chiefs of US and Chinese Navies Agree on Need for Cooperation
DoD Cyber Strategy Defines How Officials Discern Cyber Incidents from Armed Attacks
Vice Adm. Tighe Takes Charge of Information Warfare, Naval Intelligence
Truman Strike Group Completes Eight-Month Deployment
KC-46 Completes Milestone by Refueling Fighter Jet, Cargo Plane
Air Dominance and the Critical Role of Fifth Generation Fighters
Une nation est une âme
The Challenges of Ungoverned Spaces
Carter Salutes Iraqi Forces, Announces 560 U.S. Troops to Deploy to Iraq
Obama: U.S. Commitment to European Security is Unwavering in Pivotal Time for NATO
International Court to Decide Sovereignty Issue in South China Sea
La SPA 75 est centenaire !
U.S. to Deploy THAAD Missile Battery to South Korea
Maintien en condition des matériels : reprendre l’initiative
La veste « léopard », premier uniforme militaire de camouflage
Océan Indien 2016 : Opérations & Coopération
Truman Transits Strait of Gibraltar
Navy Unveils National Museum of the American Sailor
New Navy, Old Tar
Marcel Dassault parrain de la nouvelle promotion d’officiers de l’École de l’Air
RIMPAC 2016 : Ravitaillement à la mer pour le Prairial avant l’arrivée à Hawaii
Bataille de la Somme, l’oubliée
U.S., Iceland Sign Security Cooperation Agreement
Cléopatra : la frégate Jean Bart entre dans l’histoire du BPC Gamal Abdel Nasser
Surveiller l’espace maritime français aussi par satellite
America's Navy-Marine Corps Team Fuse for RIMPAC 2016
Stratégie France : Plaidoyer pour une véritable coopération franco-allemande
La lumière du Droit rayonne au bout du chemin





Directeur de la publication : Joël-François Dumont
Comité de rédaction : Jacques de Lestapis, Hugues Dumont, François de Vries (Bruxelles), Hans-Ulrich Helfer (Suisse), Michael Hellerforth (Allemagne).
Comité militaire : VAE Guy Labouérie (†), GAA François Mermet (2S), CF Patrice Théry (Asie).

Contact