Éditoriaux Défense Sécurité Terrorisme Zones de conflits Logistique Livres de référence Liens
Terre Air Mer Gendarmerie Renseignement Infoguerre Cyber Recherche

Building on Capabilities and Steering Change

Building on Capabilities and Steering Change

Speech by NATO Secretary General, Lord Robertson, at the SACLANT Seminar, Norfolk, 19 June 2003. Source: NATO.

Excellencies,

Admirals,

Generals,

Ladies and Gentlemen,

Let me first, once again, congratulate Adm. Giambastiani on assuming his new duties as SACTRANS.

It is now time to turn to the second stage of our proceedings here today: the Seminar. And the theme of the Seminar is, in a sense, the core of the mission of the new Transformation Command: "Building on Capabilities and Steering Change".

I will unfortunately not be able to stay for the full Seminar, as I have to leave for the EU-Balkan Summit in Thessaloniki. But those of you who have the privilege to remain will get a vivid demonstration of transformation in action, including tomorrow at the Joint Warfighting Center. You will see revolutionary new technologies and new doctrines. And you will get a glimpse of what these changes might mean for the future of military operations.

That future, however, is now. These transformation concepts are no longer restricted to the battle lab. They are no longer theories dreamed up by academics and brainy colonels, and demonstrated on computers. These new technologies, new doctrines and new concepts are being used today -- in the major conflicts on the front pages of our newspapers.

Kosovo, then Afghanistan, and now the recent war in Iraq demonstrate the implications, and the importance, of key new capabilities – and new ways of thinking about using these capabilities. Precision strike, for instance, not only allows those who have it to hit exactly the target they want, with the minimum of unintended casualties. It also means a huge reduction in the amount of munitions required, and even in the number of planes needed. This has enormous potential to free up resources for other pressing needs.

Battlespace awareness, or knowing where the enemy is, enables those who have it to place their forces wherever the enemy is not, throughout the battlefield, and then to out manoeuvre them. It allows for smaller, lighter but more effective forces.

There are other equally important characteristics of transformation, such as speed of decision making and action, but the point is clear. We have seen enough proof, over the past few years, that these transformational concepts deliver on their promise: military success, in a relatively short time, and at a low cost in lives on both sides. That is why transformation is so important, and why I have championed it so long, and so loudly.

But like anything, transformation must be done right, if it is to deliver. And that means that NATO’s transformation must meet two key tests.

First, we must invest in the right capabilities. And we know what they are. Strategic air and sea lift, to get our forces to where they need to be, in time. Air-to-air refuelling. Precision-guided munitions. Chemical, biological and nuclear defence, including early warning, surveillance, consequence management, stand-off detection and collective protection. Deployable and secure command, control and communications capabilities for our Headquarters. Air-to-ground-surveillance. Suppression of enemy air defence and support jamming. Combat support and combat service support.

These are the requirements for modern operations. And the entire Alliance is already moving together to develop and deliver them. At our Summit last November, our Heads of State and Government gave their support to the Prague Capabilities Commitment, which set out specific targets in each of these important areas, and clear timelines to acquire them.

We have made good progress since then. In acquiring PGMs, for example, we are right on target; and the ambitious initiatives on strategic airlift and sealift are moving ahead well. But there are other areas where progress is lacking, and we need to do more. Because the potential of Allied Command Transformation can only be reached if our forces have the tools to translate theory into reality.

But transformation is about far more than new weapons. It’s about a change in mindset; an openness to new, sometimes radical, ideas; an ability to connect all the dots of ideas and information; and a nimbleness to reflect all of this in joint operations.

For transformation to be successful, it must also be shared. If the United States’ Allies lag behind in embracing transformation, then American unilateralism will become a self-fulfilling prophecy, whether the US wants partners or not. This is in no one’s interest, on either side of the Atlantic.

ACT has the vital role to play here. This command will plug in to the latest US thinking on transformation through the Joint Forces Command. And it will act as a bridge across the Atlantic, making sure that the best practice and latest ideas from Europe and North America are shared – in both directions.

ACT will provide NATO commanders with up-to-date scenarios, the latest lessons learned, realistic mission rehearsals, and well-trained staff. As the command in charge of training, standardisation, concept development and experimentation, ACT will have a huge, and positive impact, on how NATO trains and prepares for future crises.

The NATO Response Force will also help here. The NRF will be a hothouse in which these advanced technologies and doctrines flourish. And because all Allies will have the possibility of contributing forces to the NRF, the benefits will flow throughout the Alliance.

Ladies and Gentlemen,

The requirement for transformation and the benefits of transformation are both clear. That is why Allied Command Transformation has been created. But the issues are not simple and I hope that this seminar will expose some of the still unanswered questions.

So let me end by raising two points on which I have still not seen satisfactory answers, and which I hope you will address today and tomorrow.

First, we all need to be convinced that transformation will apply not only to high intensity warfighting but to operations across the military spectrum.

I am sure that it should. Stabilisation operations in Afghanistan and Iraq appear in reality to be as demanding as the warfighting which preceded them – even if in very different ways. Asymetric threats pose perhaps the greatest risk to our homelands. Certainly the capabilities which we have identified in the Prague Capabilities Commitment are as important in stabilisation and defeating asymetric threats as in high intensity combat.

The transformation gurus need now to show that they are thinking about winning wars of all kinds and securing the peace.

Second, you need to address the issue of the usability of NATO forces. This is less sexy than some aspects of transformation but no less vital.

As I explained last week to NATO Defence Ministers, the 18 countries of the NATO Integrated Military Structure in principle have 238 combat brigades declared to NATO. A huge figure in theory. But only 114 of these brigades are declared as deployable, and therefore usable for today’s real-world operations. And of these 114 brigades, 29 are American and over 30 are assessed by NATO to be undeployable in practice.

So 17 Allies between them deploy fewer than 50 usable brigades. These are the forces we depend on in the Balkans, Iraq, Afghanistan, Africa and so on. Yet given the need to rotate and rest forces, the absolute maximum we could sustain is around 16 brigades. And even this would require countries such as Germany, Italy, Spain and Turkey to keep two or even three brigades deployed at any one time.

There is therefore a disconnect between our collective aspirations and our current ability and willingness to deliver the forces needed to meet them. I look to the transformation community to help address this shortfall as it is already bridging the capabilities gap.

So I have no doubt that Allied Command Transformation has a big and important job to do. But I am also confident that it is in good hands. Admiral Giambastiani, let me congratulate you one final time on this appointment. And, while this Command will no longer have a dominant maritime tint, I nonetheless wish you good "sailing" in the years ahead.

 

Derniers articles

Verdun 2016 : La légende de la « tranchée des baïonnettes »
Eyes in the Dark: Navy Dive Helmet Display Emerges as Game-Changer
OIR Official: Captured Info Describes ISIL Operations in Manbij
Cyber, Space, Middle East Join Nuclear Triad Topics at Deterrence Meeting
Carter Opens Second DoD Innovation Hub in Boston
Triomphe de St-Cyr : le Vietnam sur les rangs
Dwight D. Eisenhower Conducts First OIR Missions from Arabian Gulf
L’amiral Prazuck prend la manœuvre de la Marine
Airmen Practice Rescuing Downed Pilots in Pacific Thunder 16-2
On ne lutte pas contre les moustiques avec une Kalachnikov...
Enemy Mine: Underwater Drones Hunt Buried Targets, Save Lives
Daesh Publications Are Translated Into Eleven Languages
Opération Chammal : 10 000 heures de vol en opération pour les Mirage 2000 basés en Jordanie
Le Drian : Daech : une réponse à plusieurs niveaux
Carter: Defense Ministers Agree on Next Steps in Counter-ISIL Fight
Carter Convenes Counter-ISIL Coalition Meeting at Andrews
Carter Welcomes France’s Increased Counter-ISIL Support
100-Plus Aircraft Fly in for Exercise Red Flag 16-3
Growlers Soar With B-1s Around Ellsworth AFB
A-10s Deploy to Slovakia for Cross-Border Training
We Don’t Fight Against Mosquitoes With a Kalashnikov
Bug-Hunting Computers to Compete in DARPA Cyber Grand Challenge
Chiefs of US and Chinese Navies Agree on Need for Cooperation
DoD Cyber Strategy Defines How Officials Discern Cyber Incidents from Armed Attacks
Vice Adm. Tighe Takes Charge of Information Warfare, Naval Intelligence
Truman Strike Group Completes Eight-Month Deployment
KC-46 Completes Milestone by Refueling Fighter Jet, Cargo Plane
Air Dominance and the Critical Role of Fifth Generation Fighters
Une nation est une âme
The Challenges of Ungoverned Spaces
Carter Salutes Iraqi Forces, Announces 560 U.S. Troops to Deploy to Iraq
Obama: U.S. Commitment to European Security is Unwavering in Pivotal Time for NATO
International Court to Decide Sovereignty Issue in South China Sea
La SPA 75 est centenaire !
U.S. to Deploy THAAD Missile Battery to South Korea
Maintien en condition des matériels : reprendre l’initiative
La veste « léopard », premier uniforme militaire de camouflage
Océan Indien 2016 : Opérations & Coopération
Truman Transits Strait of Gibraltar
Navy Unveils National Museum of the American Sailor
New Navy, Old Tar
Marcel Dassault parrain de la nouvelle promotion d’officiers de l’École de l’Air
RIMPAC 2016 : Ravitaillement à la mer pour le Prairial avant l’arrivée à Hawaii
Bataille de la Somme, l’oubliée
U.S., Iceland Sign Security Cooperation Agreement
Cléopatra : la frégate Jean Bart entre dans l’histoire du BPC Gamal Abdel Nasser
Surveiller l’espace maritime français aussi par satellite
America's Navy-Marine Corps Team Fuse for RIMPAC 2016
Stratégie France : Plaidoyer pour une véritable coopération franco-allemande
La lumière du Droit rayonne au bout du chemin





Directeur de la publication : Joël-François Dumont
Comité de rédaction : Jacques de Lestapis, Hugues Dumont, François de Vries (Bruxelles), Hans-Ulrich Helfer (Suisse), Michael Hellerforth (Allemagne).
Comité militaire : VAE Guy Labouérie (†), GAA François Mermet (2S), CF Patrice Théry (Asie).

Contact