Addressing Threats As and Where They Arise
Addressing Threats As and Where They Arise
Speech by Jaap de Hoop Scheffer, Secretary General of NATO at
ICI Seminar, NATO Defence College, Rome, March 18, 2005.
Your Excellencies, Ladies and Gentlemen,
Last May, this college hosted a seminar on the Mediterranean Dialogue, which
stimulated the significant progress that we have seen recently in that
relationship. So I am optimistic that today’s seminar, here in Rome, will help
to lay out the path for another most successful and mutually beneficial
relationship: the relationship between NATO and the states involved in the
Istanbul Cooperation Initiative.
This seminar brings together representatives from NATO and from the Gulf States
participating in the ICI, as well as highly distinguished academics and
parliamentarians. Your interest and participation are testimony to the
importance of this new relationship. When deciding on the format for today, I
was keen to promote a not too formal setting. In this way, I hope that we can
have a broad discussion, and maximise the opportunity to draw on the expertise
and the wealth of knowledge present in this hall.
But let me start today’s proceedings by placing the ICI in context. The
Initiative is not something that appeared out of thin air. Quite the opposite.
The decisions taken by NATO Heads of State and Government in Istanbul last
summer were a logical outcome of the changed security environment. It is the
changing security landscape that spawned NATO’s evolving outreach policy, and it
also led to NATO being deployed on operations in countries that are of
particular interest to the states of the Gulf Region.
The threats we face in today’s security environment are not unique to NATO’s
Allies – they are common across the globe. Terrorism, the proliferation of
weapons of mass destruction, and failed states, pose challenges that require a
change in the way we view defence and security.
That is why NATO has developed, and continues to develop, a
network of partnerships. Indeed, I am reminded of an Arab proverb that states “In
the desert of life, the wise person travels by caravan, whereas the fool prefers
to travel alone”.
NATO’s partnership network – its “caravan”, if you will - started with what we
now call the Euro-Atlantic Partnership Council. This partnership gradually
expanded and today it consists of 20 countries from Scandinavia, the Balkans,
the Caucasus and Central Asia. It also includes NATO’s important partners,
Russia and Ukraine. And the success and rationale of this partnership prompted
the further development of links with non-NATO countries, through the
establishment of NATO’s Mediterranean Dialogue.
Seven countries from North Africa and the broader Middle East now participate
and the Mediterranean Dialogue has been moving steadily forward during its
10-year existence. Last December there was a first-ever, joint meeting of NATO’s
and Mediterranean Dialogue countries’ Foreign Ministers in Brussels. This
meeting was very positive and, coupled with the initiatives identified at last
year’s seminar here in Rome, has allowed us to take the Dialogue to a new level.
We are now embarking on a much more ambitious work programme with our
Mediterranean Dialogue partners.
It was therefore a natural step to seek a cooperative relationship with the
states of the Gulf Region. And so I would describe the first driver behind the
ICI as the progressive evolution of NATO’s partnership policy.
It is clear that in the face of the new threats, it is
important to address them as and where they arise. We cannot allow them to go
unhindered, otherwise they will end up on our doorstep. And that is why the
Alliance is now engaged in a number of important military commitments. We have a
major maritime operation in the Mediterranean. And we are also engaged under
United Nations mandates in a security assistance operation in Afghanistan, in a
peacekeeping operation in Kosovo, and in a training mission in Iraq. And it is
encouraging to see that many of our partners often participate in these NATO-led
Afghanistan and Iraq are countries that are of a particular interest to the
states of the Gulf Region, and so are the issues of terrorism and the
proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. It therefore makes eminent sense
for NATO and the states of the Gulf Region to discuss these common interests.
In light of these two factors – the progressive evolution of NATO’s partnership
policy and NATO’s operational commitments - the rationale for NATO and the
states of the Gulf Region to seek closer cooperation becomes clear. But we are
still at the very early stages of our relationship. So far, three states,
Kuwait, Bahrain and Qatar have already formally joined the initiative, and I am
optimistic that the three other Gulf States (Oman, Saudi Arabia and the United
Arab Emirates) will join shortly. And of course, other states in the broader
region that subscribe to the aims and content of the Initiative would also be
welcome to join.
Well, we have agreed on a number of key principles.
The relationship is very much a two-way street, and it should
be. The Initiative will be flexible to allow for the different needs and
requests of the individual participating states.
There is important work being undertaken by the Gulf States
within the framework of the Gulf Cooperation Council. They are enhancing their
cooperation in a number of fields, including in the political, economic and
security domains. And it is in the latter area that NATO’s efforts should assist
the individual states, while supporting and building on their current efforts.
We also acknowledge that there are a number of other actors in the region. And
so NATO’s efforts should also be complementary to the other international
initiatives, such as those of the European Union. In addition, some individual
NATO Allies have existing bilateral or multilateral arrangements in place.
It is important, therefore, that NATO’s work with the ICI participating states
should focus on those areas where NATO has added value. In essence, what we are
seeking with this Initiative, is to promote security and regional stability
through bilateral cooperation between NATO and the individual states in a number
of specific areas where the Alliance can add value.
We have already proposed twelve broad areas for potential practical cooperation
this year. The programme includes, for example, cooperation in the fight against
terrorism and against the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. It also
includes cooperation in defence reform, in crisis management and civil emergency
planning, as well as in military-to-military contacts, exercises and education.
And within each broad area, there is a menu of specific activities.
We have decided to take a gradual approach, and one that promotes transparency.
For that reason, it is intended initially to focus on activities that will
promote mutual understanding. But naturally there is an aspiration to expand the
menu of activities over time as that mutual understanding grows.
A key feature of all our early work, will be the need to underpin what we are
doing with a clear public diplomacy effort in the region, both by NATO and the
ICI states. We need to emphasise that this is a relationship that is beneficial
to all concerned. And to achieve this, we must do better at explaining what we
are, what we do, and most importantly, why we do it. We have to overcome
prejudices, correct misconceptions, share experiences and build trust.
Your Excellencies, Ladies and Gentlemen,
By promoting mutual understanding, and by adding value to the existing bilateral,
multilateral and regional mechanisms, the Istanbul Cooperation Initiative offers
the opportunity to make a positive contribution to security and stability in the
Broader Middle East Region. Today’s seminar is taking place against the backdrop
of change in that region. Of course, tremendous challenges remain. But there
does appear to be a genuine feeling of cautious optimism in particular with
regard to settlement of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. And Allies are now
looking into ways to respond to the wish expressed by the Palestinians to also
enter a dialogue with NATO. In Iraq, we saw the courageous actions of the voters
which should form a milestone towards the durable stabilisation of that country.
And, in close cooperation with the United States, the European Union is leading
the International Community’s efforts to address the serious concern raised by
Iran’s nuclear programme.
These are positive signs – and it is absolutely vital that this positive
momentum now be maintained. NATO and its partners in the Istanbul Cooperation
Initiative have a role to play in maintaining it. And so I am looking forward to
hearing your ideas and views during the course of the day on how we should take
this Initiative forward.
I encourage you all to make the most of the opportunities that this seminar
provides - to share thoughts, to prompt debate and discussion, and to give
additional substance to maintaining the momentum I’ve just described. Thank you.