Éditoriaux Défense Sécurité Terrorisme Zones de conflits Logistique Livres de référence Liens
Terre Air Mer Gendarmerie Renseignement Infoguerre Cyber Recherche

QDR Approves Joint Force Headquarters Concept

QDR Approves Joint Force Headquarters Concept

By Jim Garamone, American Forces Press Service

Washington D.C. -- (AFPS) October 29, 2001 -- Forming a headquarters at the height of an international crisis is not the best way to do business, and the Quadrennial Defense Review suggested changing that situation.

The U.S. Joint Forces Command is working on the structure of a standing joint task force headquarters.

Overall, the QDR recommended strengthening joint operations in the U.S. military. America needs the services to be better integrated as it faces the different threats of the 21st century.

The days of setting up ad hoc headquarters once a crisis erupts must become a thing of the past. Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld uses the experiences of Operation Allied Force over Kosovo as the prime example. By the time the operation ended, the headquarters had filled only 80 percent of its necessary slots.

The destroyer USS Gonzalez breaks away from the USS Arctic, after resupply at sea. The Gonzalez was on station in the Adriatic Sea with the USS Theodore Roosevelt carrier battle group in support of NATO Operation Allied Force in 1999. Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld uses the 1999 operation as a prime example why standing joint task force headquarters are needed in the future. When the 60-day air war over Yugoslavia ended, the ad hoc headquarters formed to coordinate it had filled only 80 percent of its necessary slots.

Photo by Petty Officer 3rd class Todd Linard, USN

"The after-action report from every joint operation has said that we could have been much more effective, earlier, if we had been a team when the crisis started rather than trying to form our team while the crisis is ongoing," said Army Col. Chris Shepherd, director of strategic communications in the Joint Experimentation Directorate.

A joint force headquarters would be much more effective if it is formed and existing before a crisis because it will have gone through all those steps any organization goes through when it first stands up. Shepherd said initial experiments are looking at a 55-person core group for the headquarters..

UH-60 Black Hawk support helicopters arrive at Rinas Airport, Tirana, Albania, in support of NATO Operation Allied Force. Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld uses the 1999 operation as a prime example why standing joint task force headquarters are needed in the future. When the 60-day air war over Yugoslavia ended, the ad hoc headquarters formed to coordinate it had filled only 80 percent of its necessary slots.

Photo by Tech. Sgt. Cesar Rodriguez, USAF

Potentially, standing headquarters would be assigned to the various regional commanders in chief and be integrated with all aspects of the command. "The truth of the matter is, it may be more than one for each of the (commanders)," he said. "The key value of having this headquarters in place is to have a joint command and control element that has a tacit understanding of the battle space where the crisis erupts."

The people in the headquarters must understand the people, the culture, the social relationships and the economic linkages. "They must understand the whole ball of wax that goes toward figuring out what's important to your adversary and how to take that away," Shepherd said.

A U.S. Air Force B-2 aircraft refuels over the Atlantic Ocean during a mission in support of NATO Operation Allied Force. Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld uses the 1999 operation as a prime example why standing joint task force headquarters are needed in the future. When the 60-day air war over Yugoslavia ended, the ad hoc headquarters formed to coordinate it had filled only 80 percent of its necessary slots.

Photo by Staff Sgt. Kevin Ohlson, USAF

It is equally important to know allies and friends in the region and what each country or group can bring to the table, he said. Further, the headquarters would know who to speak to in other U.S. agencies or coalition governments to get important information and mitigate actions. That "reachback" is important as the United States faces unconventional foes. "The classic case you hear about was during the whole Yugoslavian crisis," Shepherd said. "The thought was, 'You don't ask a military officer how much money (Yugoslavian President Slobodan) Milosevic has left'."

The joint task force headquarters would be flexible. In a full-blown regional conflict, the commander in chief's staff "would fall in on this core element of 55 people to form the joint headquarters and get a head start on finding a solution to the crisis.

But the 55-person cell could be employed in a number of different ways as well, Shepherd said. "If there was some kind of crisis that was less than a full unified command would fight -- something like support to East Timor -- the commander in chief could take this standing joint command and control element, place a general or flag officer in charge, then that headquarters could handle that crisis."

A medium employment of the standing joint task force headquarters also is contemplated. This would be where the 55-person core element has a three-star headquarters "roll in" on top of it to become the joint task force headquarters.

An F-15E Strike Eagle pilot from the 494th Fighter Squadron, RAF Lakenheath, United Kingdom, waits for a signal to shut down his engines after returning from a Operation Allied Force bombing mission over Yugoslavia. Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld uses the 1999 operation as a prime example why standing joint task force headquarters are needed in the future. When the 60-day air war over Yugoslavia ended, the ad hoc headquarters formed to coordinate it had filled only 80 percent of its necessary slots.

Photo by Senior Airman Jeffrey Allen, USAF

"The commander in chief would designate one of his subordinates as the JTF commander, who would then have other service components working for him," Shepherd said.

Joint Forces Command already has a prototype called the Experimental Standing Joint Command and Control Element. "We do have a 55-person cell that is acting as a joint force headquarters for the various experiments we have ongoing between now and (Experiment) Millennium Challenge."

Millennium Challenge, set for July and August 2002, is the next big test of the concept. The 55-person cell will serve as the core and the Army's XVIII Airborne Corps will be the JTF headquarters.

JFCOM will make recommendations on standing joint force headquarters following Millennium Challenge 02, according to Shepherd.

 

Derniers articles

Verdun 2016 : La légende de la « tranchée des baïonnettes »
Eyes in the Dark: Navy Dive Helmet Display Emerges as Game-Changer
OIR Official: Captured Info Describes ISIL Operations in Manbij
Cyber, Space, Middle East Join Nuclear Triad Topics at Deterrence Meeting
Carter Opens Second DoD Innovation Hub in Boston
Triomphe de St-Cyr : le Vietnam sur les rangs
Dwight D. Eisenhower Conducts First OIR Missions from Arabian Gulf
L’amiral Prazuck prend la manœuvre de la Marine
Airmen Practice Rescuing Downed Pilots in Pacific Thunder 16-2
On ne lutte pas contre les moustiques avec une Kalachnikov...
Enemy Mine: Underwater Drones Hunt Buried Targets, Save Lives
Daesh Publications Are Translated Into Eleven Languages
Opération Chammal : 10 000 heures de vol en opération pour les Mirage 2000 basés en Jordanie
Le Drian : Daech : une réponse à plusieurs niveaux
Carter: Defense Ministers Agree on Next Steps in Counter-ISIL Fight
Carter Convenes Counter-ISIL Coalition Meeting at Andrews
Carter Welcomes France’s Increased Counter-ISIL Support
100-Plus Aircraft Fly in for Exercise Red Flag 16-3
Growlers Soar With B-1s Around Ellsworth AFB
A-10s Deploy to Slovakia for Cross-Border Training
We Don’t Fight Against Mosquitoes With a Kalashnikov
Bug-Hunting Computers to Compete in DARPA Cyber Grand Challenge
Chiefs of US and Chinese Navies Agree on Need for Cooperation
DoD Cyber Strategy Defines How Officials Discern Cyber Incidents from Armed Attacks
Vice Adm. Tighe Takes Charge of Information Warfare, Naval Intelligence
Truman Strike Group Completes Eight-Month Deployment
KC-46 Completes Milestone by Refueling Fighter Jet, Cargo Plane
Air Dominance and the Critical Role of Fifth Generation Fighters
Une nation est une âme
The Challenges of Ungoverned Spaces
Carter Salutes Iraqi Forces, Announces 560 U.S. Troops to Deploy to Iraq
Obama: U.S. Commitment to European Security is Unwavering in Pivotal Time for NATO
International Court to Decide Sovereignty Issue in South China Sea
La SPA 75 est centenaire !
U.S. to Deploy THAAD Missile Battery to South Korea
Maintien en condition des matériels : reprendre l’initiative
La veste « léopard », premier uniforme militaire de camouflage
Océan Indien 2016 : Opérations & Coopération
Truman Transits Strait of Gibraltar
Navy Unveils National Museum of the American Sailor
New Navy, Old Tar
Marcel Dassault parrain de la nouvelle promotion d’officiers de l’École de l’Air
RIMPAC 2016 : Ravitaillement à la mer pour le Prairial avant l’arrivée à Hawaii
Bataille de la Somme, l’oubliée
U.S., Iceland Sign Security Cooperation Agreement
Cléopatra : la frégate Jean Bart entre dans l’histoire du BPC Gamal Abdel Nasser
Surveiller l’espace maritime français aussi par satellite
America's Navy-Marine Corps Team Fuse for RIMPAC 2016
Stratégie France : Plaidoyer pour une véritable coopération franco-allemande
La lumière du Droit rayonne au bout du chemin





Directeur de la publication : Joël-François Dumont
Comité de rédaction : Jacques de Lestapis, Hugues Dumont, François de Vries (Bruxelles), Hans-Ulrich Helfer (Suisse), Michael Hellerforth (Allemagne).
Comité militaire : VAE Guy Labouérie (†), GAA François Mermet (2S), CF Patrice Théry (Asie).

Contact