Éditoriaux Défense Sécurité Terrorisme Zones de conflits Logistique Livres de référence Liens
Terre Air Mer Gendarmerie Renseignement Infoguerre Cyber Recherche

U.S. Asks Can You? Will You? of NATO Hopefuls

U.S. Asks Can You? Will You? of NATO Hopefuls

By Jim Garamone, American Forces Press Service.

Washington D.C. -- (AFPS) May 29, 2002 -- Nine countries are lined up seeking admission into the North Atlantic Treaty Organization in November.

The fact that so many emerging democracies are looking to join begs the question of whether the North Atlantic alliance is relevant in the post-Cold War world, said Lord George Robertson, secretary-general of the alliance.

The nine countries seeking admission are Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Romania, Bulgaria, Albania, and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia. During a meeting in Prague, Czech Republic, in November, the heads of state of the 19 NATO countries will announce which countries will be invited to join the alliance.

A senior defense official said the United States is looking at NATO enlargement through the lens of two questions. First, how will the admission of the candidate country promote and protect NATO's values and interests?"

Second, how enduring will the applicant country's commitment be to those responsibilities?

What lies behind these questions is a vision of Europe free and undivided, a Europe allowed to grow in peace. "This is in some ways driven by a desire to have a Europe that is even more effective and more capable partner with the United States in promoting our common interests," said the senior official.

In other words, a divided Europe may face security challenges. That Europe would be less able to work with the United States. It is in the United States' interest that democracy flourish in Europe and that the democracies band together.

But NATO is not a club that anyone can join. The nations invited must be ready to shoulder the responsibilities of membership. They must bring capabilities to the alliance.

"Like current members, (the candidate countries) have a variety of different levels and capabilities," the senior official said. "The question is do they bring a net gain to the alliance?"

That call is made based on judgments on what the various nations' politics are, what their economies are, what military capabilities they bring, and how their membership affects the alliance geopolitically.

This is the second round of enlargement since the end of the Cold War. In 1999, the 50th anniversary of the alliance, Hungary, the Czech Republic and Poland joined NATO. "The round of enlargement in 1999 will significantly influence this round," the defense official said.

"We have a better sense of what to look for," he continued. It benefits applicants because they have a better grasp of what to expect.

The official said the applicants are better prepared this time in part because of NATO's Membership Action Plan. The plan lays out many of the goals candidate countries need to meet to qualify for membership. Some of the countries have been working on their plans since NATO instituted the program in 1997.

Another leg up for many of these countries is their membership in the Partnership for Peace program, formed in 1994. This program enables both applicant countries and others, such as Uzbekistan, to meet and exercise with NATO nations.

Candidate countries have also demonstrated their value and commitment through their contributions to the Stabilization Force in Bosnia and the Kosovo Force. From a U.S. perspective, "European applicants have made contributions to U.S. operations that demonstrate the relevance and value and geographic value of NATO enlargement," said the official. Many of the countries also are part of the international coalition arrayed against global terrorism.

Once the countries become members of NATO, they will be treated as all current members are. "There is no halfway house, no junior partnership (in NATO)," said the official. "They will receive all the rights and benefits of membership, and they will assume the responsibilities of membership and face the same expectations."

The official said the experience of the addition of the three countries in 1999 was worthwhile. He said they have fulfilled all NATO commitments with expediency and enthusiasm. "I think when you look at those new members, one could argue that they bring a refreshing trans-Atlantic perspective," he said. "My sense is any new allies would do the same."

The official said these new countries value the Euro-Atlantic relationship. "They see NATO as relevant, they see NATO's charter as mutually beneficial on both sides of the Atlantic. They want to be in NATO because they value NATO," he said.

 

Derniers articles

Verdun 2016 : La légende de la « tranchée des baïonnettes »
Eyes in the Dark: Navy Dive Helmet Display Emerges as Game-Changer
OIR Official: Captured Info Describes ISIL Operations in Manbij
Cyber, Space, Middle East Join Nuclear Triad Topics at Deterrence Meeting
Carter Opens Second DoD Innovation Hub in Boston
Triomphe de St-Cyr : le Vietnam sur les rangs
Dwight D. Eisenhower Conducts First OIR Missions from Arabian Gulf
L’amiral Prazuck prend la manœuvre de la Marine
Airmen Practice Rescuing Downed Pilots in Pacific Thunder 16-2
On ne lutte pas contre les moustiques avec une Kalachnikov...
Enemy Mine: Underwater Drones Hunt Buried Targets, Save Lives
Daesh Publications Are Translated Into Eleven Languages
Opération Chammal : 10 000 heures de vol en opération pour les Mirage 2000 basés en Jordanie
Le Drian : Daech : une réponse à plusieurs niveaux
Carter: Defense Ministers Agree on Next Steps in Counter-ISIL Fight
Carter Convenes Counter-ISIL Coalition Meeting at Andrews
Carter Welcomes France’s Increased Counter-ISIL Support
100-Plus Aircraft Fly in for Exercise Red Flag 16-3
Growlers Soar With B-1s Around Ellsworth AFB
A-10s Deploy to Slovakia for Cross-Border Training
We Don’t Fight Against Mosquitoes With a Kalashnikov
Bug-Hunting Computers to Compete in DARPA Cyber Grand Challenge
Chiefs of US and Chinese Navies Agree on Need for Cooperation
DoD Cyber Strategy Defines How Officials Discern Cyber Incidents from Armed Attacks
Vice Adm. Tighe Takes Charge of Information Warfare, Naval Intelligence
Truman Strike Group Completes Eight-Month Deployment
KC-46 Completes Milestone by Refueling Fighter Jet, Cargo Plane
Air Dominance and the Critical Role of Fifth Generation Fighters
Une nation est une âme
The Challenges of Ungoverned Spaces
Carter Salutes Iraqi Forces, Announces 560 U.S. Troops to Deploy to Iraq
Obama: U.S. Commitment to European Security is Unwavering in Pivotal Time for NATO
International Court to Decide Sovereignty Issue in South China Sea
La SPA 75 est centenaire !
U.S. to Deploy THAAD Missile Battery to South Korea
Maintien en condition des matériels : reprendre l’initiative
La veste « léopard », premier uniforme militaire de camouflage
Océan Indien 2016 : Opérations & Coopération
Truman Transits Strait of Gibraltar
Navy Unveils National Museum of the American Sailor
New Navy, Old Tar
Marcel Dassault parrain de la nouvelle promotion d’officiers de l’École de l’Air
RIMPAC 2016 : Ravitaillement à la mer pour le Prairial avant l’arrivée à Hawaii
Bataille de la Somme, l’oubliée
U.S., Iceland Sign Security Cooperation Agreement
Cléopatra : la frégate Jean Bart entre dans l’histoire du BPC Gamal Abdel Nasser
Surveiller l’espace maritime français aussi par satellite
America's Navy-Marine Corps Team Fuse for RIMPAC 2016
Stratégie France : Plaidoyer pour une véritable coopération franco-allemande
La lumière du Droit rayonne au bout du chemin





Directeur de la publication : Joël-François Dumont
Comité de rédaction : Jacques de Lestapis, Hugues Dumont, François de Vries (Bruxelles), Hans-Ulrich Helfer (Suisse), Michael Hellerforth (Allemagne).
Comité militaire : VAE Guy Labouérie (†), GAA François Mermet (2S), CF Patrice Théry (Asie).

Contact