Éditoriaux Défense Sécurité Terrorisme Zones de conflits Logistique Livres de référence Liens
Terre Air Mer Gendarmerie Renseignement Infoguerre Cyber Recherche

Protecting Critical Military Infrastructures

Protecting Critical Military Infrastructures

By Jim Garamone, American Forces Press Service.

Arlington, Virginia -- (AFPS) December 7, 2001 -- Even before Sept. 11, DoD recognized the importance of protecting critical infrastructures.

For more than two years, experts in the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Command, Control, Communications and Intelligence have been working to identify DoD's critical assets and their associated supporting infrastructures, and develop policy on their protection, and game how the department would work if a node in these infrastructures were destroyed.

Tom Bozek is the director of the Critical Infrastructure Protection Office. He leads a small staff that is putting in place the policy framework for critical infrastructure protection.

The military has long known certain physical or cyber capabilities are essential to protect the nation. They are also essential to help the military accomplish its missions. Measures can be as mundane as physically protecting a facility or installation to ensuring satellite communications continue uninterrupted. The office studies the big picture and applies lessons to specific fixes.

"We want to learn the lessons once and implement the solutions many times," Bozek said.

Bozek's office works with the warfighting commands to determine what capabilities are critical to their missions. Then the office works with the service or agency that "owns" the asset to ensure the capability is protected or that procedures are established so the mission continues in the event of a breakdown.

It's a big job. "We're trying to understand what assets are critical to military mission success," Bozek said. The office concentrates on these critical infrastructures: transportation, logistics, financial services, public works, health affairs, personnel, defense information, space, and intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance.

Bozek said the picture is complicated because there are many interrelationships between the various infrastructures. "We know that there are interrelationships among the assets in these infrastructures," he said. An asset failure in one infrastructure may have an adverse cascading afect on assets in many other infrastructures.

Once the group defines the interdependencies, it can isolate where the single points of failure may be that would cause mission failures.

The group has built on experience gained during the Year 2000 computer bug effort. "We're taking advantage of the Y2K experiences. That's a good example of the interdependencies," Bozek said. "You have a variety of information systems that are connected. They pass data to each other through this network. The same is true on physical infrastructures – transportation, logistics, financial services and so on. So, we find the same principles apply to these infrastructures that we learned in Y2K."

The office calls on many different agencies for help. Bozek relies on the Navy's Joint Program Office for Special Technology Countermeasures as the overall technical agent. He also calls on the Defense Threat Reduction Agency for balanced survivability assessments.

In addition, the office works closely with the Homeland Security Division of the Joint Staff, and with all the combat commands, services and combat support agencies. The office also works with the FBI and the National Infrastructure Protection Center.

The Sept. 11 attacks underscored for the military the need for redundant facilities and partnerships with private industries. The attacks in New York, for example, illustrated the robustness of U.S. telecommunications facilities. Private telecommunications companies -- that DoD uses also -- reconstituted financial communications networks fairly quickly.

But the attacks illustrated how much the military relies on private firms for infrastructure support. "We are dependent on our private sector partners," Bozek said. "Our telecom is over private lines, most bases take power from private sources. Private shipping lines augment our sealift and airlift.

"We are developing even closer relationships with our private partners to identify potential vulnerabilities and to get better."

In light of the asymmetrical threats the U.S. military faces, the mission given Bozek's office is never-ending.

"Critical infrastructure protection has a defensive focus, offense almost always has the advantage," he said. "There are always going to be newer creative ways adversaries are going to use to try to overcome our defenses. Everyone needs to be vigilant."


Derniers articles

Verdun 2016 : La légende de la « tranchée des baïonnettes »
Eyes in the Dark: Navy Dive Helmet Display Emerges as Game-Changer
OIR Official: Captured Info Describes ISIL Operations in Manbij
Cyber, Space, Middle East Join Nuclear Triad Topics at Deterrence Meeting
Carter Opens Second DoD Innovation Hub in Boston
Triomphe de St-Cyr : le Vietnam sur les rangs
Dwight D. Eisenhower Conducts First OIR Missions from Arabian Gulf
L’amiral Prazuck prend la manœuvre de la Marine
Airmen Practice Rescuing Downed Pilots in Pacific Thunder 16-2
On ne lutte pas contre les moustiques avec une Kalachnikov...
Enemy Mine: Underwater Drones Hunt Buried Targets, Save Lives
Daesh Publications Are Translated Into Eleven Languages
Opération Chammal : 10 000 heures de vol en opération pour les Mirage 2000 basés en Jordanie
Le Drian : Daech : une réponse à plusieurs niveaux
Carter: Defense Ministers Agree on Next Steps in Counter-ISIL Fight
Carter Convenes Counter-ISIL Coalition Meeting at Andrews
Carter Welcomes France’s Increased Counter-ISIL Support
100-Plus Aircraft Fly in for Exercise Red Flag 16-3
Growlers Soar With B-1s Around Ellsworth AFB
A-10s Deploy to Slovakia for Cross-Border Training
We Don’t Fight Against Mosquitoes With a Kalashnikov
Bug-Hunting Computers to Compete in DARPA Cyber Grand Challenge
Chiefs of US and Chinese Navies Agree on Need for Cooperation
DoD Cyber Strategy Defines How Officials Discern Cyber Incidents from Armed Attacks
Vice Adm. Tighe Takes Charge of Information Warfare, Naval Intelligence
Truman Strike Group Completes Eight-Month Deployment
KC-46 Completes Milestone by Refueling Fighter Jet, Cargo Plane
Air Dominance and the Critical Role of Fifth Generation Fighters
Une nation est une âme
The Challenges of Ungoverned Spaces
Carter Salutes Iraqi Forces, Announces 560 U.S. Troops to Deploy to Iraq
Obama: U.S. Commitment to European Security is Unwavering in Pivotal Time for NATO
International Court to Decide Sovereignty Issue in South China Sea
La SPA 75 est centenaire !
U.S. to Deploy THAAD Missile Battery to South Korea
Maintien en condition des matériels : reprendre l’initiative
La veste « léopard », premier uniforme militaire de camouflage
Océan Indien 2016 : Opérations & Coopération
Truman Transits Strait of Gibraltar
Navy Unveils National Museum of the American Sailor
New Navy, Old Tar
Marcel Dassault parrain de la nouvelle promotion d’officiers de l’École de l’Air
RIMPAC 2016 : Ravitaillement à la mer pour le Prairial avant l’arrivée à Hawaii
Bataille de la Somme, l’oubliée
U.S., Iceland Sign Security Cooperation Agreement
Cléopatra : la frégate Jean Bart entre dans l’histoire du BPC Gamal Abdel Nasser
Surveiller l’espace maritime français aussi par satellite
America's Navy-Marine Corps Team Fuse for RIMPAC 2016
Stratégie France : Plaidoyer pour une véritable coopération franco-allemande
La lumière du Droit rayonne au bout du chemin

Directeur de la publication : Joël-François Dumont
Comité de rédaction : Jacques de Lestapis, Hugues Dumont, François de Vries (Bruxelles), Hans-Ulrich Helfer (Suisse), Michael Hellerforth (Allemagne).
Comité militaire : VAE Guy Labouérie (†), GAA François Mermet (2S), CF Patrice Théry (Asie).