Éditoriaux Défense Sécurité Terrorisme Zones de conflits Logistique Livres de référence Liens
Terre Air Mer Gendarmerie Renseignement Infoguerre Cyber Recherche

Offset Strategy Puts Advantage in Hands of U

Offset Strategy Puts Advantage in Hands of U.S., Allies

By Claudette Roulo, DoD News, Defense Media Activity.

Washington D.C. – (DoD News) – January 28, 2015 – In the face of one of the most volatile security environments the United States has faced in decades, the Defense Department's Defense Innovation Initiative seeks to halt the erosion of the nation's military technological superiority, Deputy Defense Secretary Bob Work said today.

The initiative, in concert with a new offset strategy, will put "the competitive advantage firmly in the hands of allied capabilities and American power projection over the coming decades," Work said in remarks prepared for delivery at a forum hosted by the Center for New American Security.

Past Offset Strategies

Offset strategies were first developed during the Cold War and were aimed at overcoming the Soviet Union's numerical superiority and geographic advantages, the deputy secretary said.

Eisenhower's "New Look" was the first such strategy, relying on nuclear weapons as a deterrent against the Warsaw Pact nations. The strategy enabled Eisenhower to cut manpower and reduce defense spending, Work said, but eventually the Soviets responded and a second offset strategy had to be developed.

Soviet modernization of their nuclear and conventional forces and the approach of nuclear parity led the United States to look outside the nuclear arsenal for deterrents, the deputy secretary said.

Following recommendations from the Long Range Research and Development Planning Program, he said, DoD developed the "Assault Breaker" program, which integrated conventional long-range weapons systems with early warning and surveillance platforms. Together, these systems were intended to break up the multi-wave armor attacks that were the hallmark of Warsaw Pact tactics of the era.

Assault Breaker opened the door to a wave of advances in precision-guided munitions, and, Work said, led to new concepts of operation for the Army and Air Force, and were incorporated into NATO doctrine as the Follow-on Forces Attack concept.

This second offset strategy "proved far more enduring than the first, providing the U.S. military with a decisive operational advantage that has lasted for nearly four decades," the deputy secretary said.

But that advantage has eroded, Work noted.

"To reverse this erosion and to ensure that our conventional deterrence remains robust, DoD is embarking on a third offset strategy that will put the competitive advantage firmly in the hands of American global power projection over the coming decades," he said.

Geopolitical Surprises

A number of "largely unanticipated geopolitical surprises" disrupted the Defense Department's fiscal year 2016 budget deliberations, he said.

In February, Russia's occupation and annexation of Crimea shocked the world and "may herald a prolonged period of heightened tension with Russia," Work said.

The United States commitment to its NATO allies is unwavering in the face of Russia's activities, the deputy secretary said.

"We are working to improve NATO’s ability to deploy faster in times of crisis, including enhancing NATO’s Rapid Response Force, and improving infrastructure and facilities to receive rapid reinforcements," he said.

The U.S. military continues "to help build partner capacity, particularly in our NATO allies in the Baltics,” Work said. “I can announce that the department’s FY 2016 budget request provides for close to $800 million to continue these activities, and expand them, under the European Reassurance Initiative.”

In June, Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant terrorists launched a fast-moving offensive out of Syria into Iraq, effectively erasing the border between the two nations, he said.

"The threat to our people and our interests, and an opportunity to partner with a new, more inclusive Iraqi government compelled the United States and our allies and partners to forge a counter-ISIL coalition and use force in Iraq to confront a growing threat," the deputy secretary said.

And, the Ebola outbreak came to international attention in August, Work said, threatening to infect up to 1.4 million people in West Africa. President Barack Obama spearheaded an international effort to confront the threat, Work said, which now appears to be on the way to being contained.

Defense Strategy Unchanged

These surprises did not lead to a departure from the current strategy, he said.

"In point of fact, it’s completely in line with the [Quadrennial Defense Review's] emphasis on innovation," the deputy secretary said. "It is about developing the means to offset advances in anti-access, area-denial networks that pose a growing challenge to our military power.

"The execution of a successful defense strategy ultimately is about balancing ends, ways, and means,” Work continued. “The new offset strategy is primarily about changing our ways and means --- the platforms, systems, and operational concepts we use to achieve our objectives."

During the Cold War, there was a monolithic enemy, Work said, but today the nation faces multiple potential military competitors -- including Russia, China, North Korea and Iran. As a result, it doesn't make sense to develop a one-size-fits-all offset strategy, he said.

And until recently, governments were behind the development of leading-edge military technologies, the deputy secretary said. Now, many technologies that might be associated with a new offset strategy are being driven by the commercial sector, Work said.

"The explosion of research and development in the non-defense sector means DoD must devise new means of pulling in commercial technology," he said.

"As it has in the past, technological innovation can serve as a catalyst to our third offset strategy, but there are no silver bullet solutions," the deputy secretary said. "Rather, we look to exploit our traditional advantages and develop new ways of operating that impose strategy-constricting costs on our adversaries."

Innovation must be broad-based and rooted in realistic wargaming, experimentation, and the development of new concepts and leadership, Work said.

The United States must provide its service members with a competitive advantage, Work said, “so that they will never find themselves evenly matched in a conflict -- that is the essence of deterrence and what will ultimately safeguard all of our interests.”

International Coordination

Challenges to power projection affect not just the United States, the deputy secretary said. NATO's interests are worldwide, he added, and America's allies must be more closely integrated into the effort to address challenges in the international security environment.

"While the Defense Innovation Initiative and a third offset strategy is a U.S. initiative, it will also require a deliberate, aggressive effort on the part of our allies," Work said.

Innovation must be pursued with interoperability in mind, he said. Not all of the nation's allies have the same access to technology and operational art, and one way to address that is to think about the potential advantages of specialization, the deputy secretary said.

"Beyond that, many or all allies have forces capable of absorbing innovative doctrine and training that are needed to eventually join in even the most sophisticated operating environments," Work said. "We will do all we can to encourage and enable all allies to innovate together, in concert. But we will also collaborate to seek niche roles and nation-specific contributions that befit some allies’ unique will and ability."

A growing resource gap is closely related to concerns within NATO of the technology gap, he said.

"All of us together need to decide this innovation effort is a priority, that this is a deliberate effort, and that we can’t float along with the current," the deputy secretary said. To secure the international environment, he said, it is imperative allied leaders fulfill the pledge made at the Wales Summit to devote 2 percent of their national outputs to defense.

"We must not shy away from, but rather embrace, the potential criticism that will come from those who fear change," Work said. "We will surely regret it if, in the future, we look back and say we didn’t go far enough. I encourage all of our allies to join with us, be bold and push the boundaries of innovation."

(Follow Claudette Roulo on Twitter: @roulododnews)
Contact Author

Bob Work

Related Sites:
The Defense Department on Facebook
The Defense Department on Twitter
DoD News on Facebook
DoD News on Twitter
DoDLive Blog
DoD News Broadcast Channel

Derniers articles

Verdun 2016 : La légende de la « tranchée des baïonnettes »
Eyes in the Dark: Navy Dive Helmet Display Emerges as Game-Changer
OIR Official: Captured Info Describes ISIL Operations in Manbij
Cyber, Space, Middle East Join Nuclear Triad Topics at Deterrence Meeting
Carter Opens Second DoD Innovation Hub in Boston
Triomphe de St-Cyr : le Vietnam sur les rangs
Dwight D. Eisenhower Conducts First OIR Missions from Arabian Gulf
L’amiral Prazuck prend la manœuvre de la Marine
Airmen Practice Rescuing Downed Pilots in Pacific Thunder 16-2
On ne lutte pas contre les moustiques avec une Kalachnikov...
Enemy Mine: Underwater Drones Hunt Buried Targets, Save Lives
Daesh Publications Are Translated Into Eleven Languages
Opération Chammal : 10 000 heures de vol en opération pour les Mirage 2000 basés en Jordanie
Le Drian : Daech : une réponse à plusieurs niveaux
Carter: Defense Ministers Agree on Next Steps in Counter-ISIL Fight
Carter Convenes Counter-ISIL Coalition Meeting at Andrews
Carter Welcomes France’s Increased Counter-ISIL Support
100-Plus Aircraft Fly in for Exercise Red Flag 16-3
Growlers Soar With B-1s Around Ellsworth AFB
A-10s Deploy to Slovakia for Cross-Border Training
We Don’t Fight Against Mosquitoes With a Kalashnikov
Bug-Hunting Computers to Compete in DARPA Cyber Grand Challenge
Chiefs of US and Chinese Navies Agree on Need for Cooperation
DoD Cyber Strategy Defines How Officials Discern Cyber Incidents from Armed Attacks
Vice Adm. Tighe Takes Charge of Information Warfare, Naval Intelligence
Truman Strike Group Completes Eight-Month Deployment
KC-46 Completes Milestone by Refueling Fighter Jet, Cargo Plane
Air Dominance and the Critical Role of Fifth Generation Fighters
Une nation est une âme
The Challenges of Ungoverned Spaces
Carter Salutes Iraqi Forces, Announces 560 U.S. Troops to Deploy to Iraq
Obama: U.S. Commitment to European Security is Unwavering in Pivotal Time for NATO
International Court to Decide Sovereignty Issue in South China Sea
La SPA 75 est centenaire !
U.S. to Deploy THAAD Missile Battery to South Korea
Maintien en condition des matériels : reprendre l’initiative
La veste « léopard », premier uniforme militaire de camouflage
Océan Indien 2016 : Opérations & Coopération
Truman Transits Strait of Gibraltar
Navy Unveils National Museum of the American Sailor
New Navy, Old Tar
Marcel Dassault parrain de la nouvelle promotion d’officiers de l’École de l’Air
RIMPAC 2016 : Ravitaillement à la mer pour le Prairial avant l’arrivée à Hawaii
Bataille de la Somme, l’oubliée
U.S., Iceland Sign Security Cooperation Agreement
Cléopatra : la frégate Jean Bart entre dans l’histoire du BPC Gamal Abdel Nasser
Surveiller l’espace maritime français aussi par satellite
America's Navy-Marine Corps Team Fuse for RIMPAC 2016
Stratégie France : Plaidoyer pour une véritable coopération franco-allemande
La lumière du Droit rayonne au bout du chemin

Directeur de la publication : Joël-François Dumont
Comité de rédaction : Jacques de Lestapis, Hugues Dumont, François de Vries (Bruxelles), Hans-Ulrich Helfer (Suisse), Michael Hellerforth (Allemagne).
Comité militaire : VAE Guy Labouérie (†), GAA François Mermet (2S), CF Patrice Théry (Asie).